RHYTHMIA HDx™

FDA Homepage

Looking for other ways to read this?
Feeding the Irrational Fear of Cholesterol. In fact, they disprove evolution. For each proton, the motor turns once, adding a phosphate to adenosine di-phosphate and converting it to adenosine tri-phosphate, the universal fuel source of cells. Walt Brown's book, In the Beginning: In the end the only sound explanation he can make is that life is profoundly discontinuous.

Mapping System

Carbohydrates: definition, classification and functions

We see the opinion of the founding fathers concerning religion throughout the land. They posted the Ten Commandments over government buildings, held prayers at the opening of government meetings, and prayed to God in the name of Jesus Christ. Forbidding Christians to pray in school, teach creation, carry a Bible to school, read the Bible in school or pray at a gathering is a violation of the Constitution as intended by the founding fathers.

Schools should be teaching that the Earth, all life on Earth and the entire universe, were created by God because it is more scientifically consistent with science and the fossil record. Intelligent design can easily be seen in every detail of nature. The Theory of Evolution consistently falls short in the absence of intermediate species, the sudden appearance of giant dinosaurs and basic science. Darwinism is the official state religion in all English-speaking countries.

The Separation of Church and State. Advice to students of light. Students in secular high schools and universities who reject the Theory of Evolution in favor of creation are commonly ridiculed, insulted, shunned, and punished by fellow atheistic students, and teachers.

The atheistic teachers will punish the students who reject evolution by using these psychological control techniques. Students who challenge the Theory of Evolution risk punishment by receiving a lower grade, simply for raising questions that expose the unscientific conclusion of the Theory of Evolution.

This website advises students to study the material presented in class in order to obtain the best test grade possible, while concealing your disagreement with the teaching.

This approach is Biblically supported. Jesus refused to talk to the Pharisees on many occasions. He talked in parables so they could not understand Him. He refused to answer at times.

God turned to the Gentiles with the gospel of grace because of the unbelief of the Jews. There comes a point where it is hopeless to try to change a hardened atheistic heart. After you receive your diploma, walk off the stage, and stomp the dust off your feet as a testimony that you are shaking off their false teaching.

The teacher is most likely to slam your grade down hard if you challenge evolution, simply because he will know you are a creationist. Staying on the Dean's list is more important at this time in your life than witnessing to hardened atheists. You can always find a hardened atheist on campus to debate. There are hundreds of them. The best opportunity to influence others is to talk with fellow students, not with the teacher.

Seek out other students to present evidence against evolution. One good example given below is the analysis of the bird trying to evolve wings large enough to fly. Study the bird dilemma carefully, and send them a link to this page.

An evolutionist has never successfully challenged it. Time is the evolutionists' god. Time is the god of evolutionists. The evolutionists' claim their time-god is very slow but infinitely powerful. The time-god is credited with the ability to accomplish anything and everything given enough time. It simply takes the time-god millions or billions of years to accomplish it. Scientifically impossible events are credited to the time-god. Evolutionists keep their time-god close at hand where they can watch their god's hands move around slowly, slowly, slowly trying to evolve new species but never succeeding.

Instant creation is rejected by evolutionists even though the fossil record shows the instant appearance of every known species. One evolutionist suggested another false theory called the "evolutionary jump" because he acknowledged this reality. He was acknowledging his brainwashing. Anyone who says he accepts the Theory of Evolution and also claims he believes in God is a liar. He does not believe in the God of the Bible who created all things and all life in an instant. Click the image to see an enlargement.

Scientists have not been able to detect any signs of life, radio signals, light signals, radar signals, or X-ray signals from any of the one hundred billion Earth-like planets in our Milky Way Galaxy. It truly appears we are totally alone.

The scientific evidence is absolutely overwhelming. These odds prove the Evolutionary Theory of Charles Darwin is false. The body and soul of Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution was his idea that evolution was made possible through natural selection. This concept is based on the suggestion that those members of a species that are a little stronger, a little larger, or run a little faster will live longer to procreate offspring with these superior adaptations.

Darwin's theory suggests that millions of generations later the changes will result in new species. These adaptations are called links or intermediates between the old species and the new. The idea of natural selection sounds great when considering deer. The deer that can sense danger the quickest and run the fastest are able to escape the predator on a more consistent basis. However, other examples on the "evolutionary tree" have many laughable flaws.

One of the best examples of evolution nonsense is the thought that a wingless bird began to evolve a wing. Why this would occur is not answered by evolutionists. The wing stub did not make the bird more adaptable to his environment. The first wing stubs would be much too small for the bird to fly.

Why would a bird evolve wing stubs that are useless? This is backwards from the evolutionary theory of natural selection, which states that birds adapt and change in order to survive better in their environment. The bird with a half-size wing is placed at a disadvantage in its environment. Why would the bird continue for millions of generations to improve a wing stub that is useless?

The Theory of Evolution is based on natural selection of the most adaptable member of a species, not the weakest. A bird with a useless wing is at a severe disadvantage. This is the opposite of natural selection. According to natural selection, the members of the bird species with the smallest useless wing would be the most adaptable and most likely to survive in the largest numbers.

According to the theory of natural selection birds could never evolve to fly. Evolution is simply nonsense. This is so funny. We are then led to believe that some birds got tired of carrying around a worthless half-size wing, so they grew fingers on the end to help climb trees.

The wings became arms and a new species was developed. Evolutionists actually believe this nonsense. The theory of "natural selection" is the basis and foundation for the Theory of Evolution.

The existence of birds literally destroys the theory of natural selection, sending the Theory of Evolution crashing like Tweety Bird below. The rest of this page stomps and grinds into dust the failed Theory of Evolution. My head is too big, and my wings are too small. Evolutionists say birds grew hollow bones for less weight in order to fly. How would a bird pass this long-term plan to the millions of generations in order to keep the lighter bone plan progressing?

The idea that birds or anything else has million-generation evolutionary plans is childish. The evolutionary concept of growing a wing over millions of generations violates the very foundation of evolution, natural selection. Birds aren't the only species that proves the theory of natural selection to be wrong. The problem can be found in all species in one way or another.

Take fish for example. We are told by evolutionists that a fish wiggled out of the sea onto dry land and became a land creature. So let's examine this idea. OK, a fish wiggles out of the sea and onto the land, but he can't breathe air.

Fish do stupid things at times. Whales keep swimming up onto the beach where they die. Do you think the whales are trying to expedite a multi-million generation plan to grow legs? That concept is stupid, but let's get back to the fish story. The gills of the fish are made for extracting oxygen from water, not from air. He chokes and gasps before flipping back into the safety of the water.

Why would he do such a stupid thing? This wiggling and choking continues for millions of generation until the fish chokes less and less. His gills evolve into lungs so he can breathe air on dry land, but now he is at risk of drowning in the water. One day he simply stays out on the land and never goes back into the water. Now he is a lizard. If you believe this evolutionary nonsense, you need psychiatric help. Giant dinosaurs literally exploded onto the scene during the Triassic period.

The fossil record petrified bones found in the ground as at the Dinosaur National Park in Jensen, Utah, USA shows no intermediate or transitional species. Where are the millions of years of fossils showing the transitional forms for dinosaurs? They do not not exist, because the dinosaurs did not evolve.

Books published by evolutionists have shown the giant Cetiosaurus dinosaur with the long neck extending upright eating from the treetops. They claimed natural selection was the reason Cetiosaurus had a long neck.

This gave them an advantage in reaching fodder that other species could not reach. One day during the assembly of a skeleton for a museum display someone noticed the neck vertebrae were such that the neck could not be lifted higher than stretched horizontally in front of them.

The natural selection theory was proven to be a big lie. The Cetiosaurus dinosaur was an undergrowth eater.

The long neck actually placed the Cetiosaurus at a disadvantage in his environment, just the opposite from the natural Theory of Natural Selection. Evolutionists will now claim the animal evolved a long neck because he had the advantage of eating from bushes on the other side of the river. This is typical of the stupid logic of an evolutionist. The evolutionist will claim that the presence of many individual species proves evolution.

This shallow statement is devoid of reason, logic, and scientific proof. Evolutionists line up pictures of similar-looking species and claim they evolved one from another. The human "family tree" is an example of this flawed theory. Petrified skulls and bones exist from hundreds of species of extinct monkeys and apes. Evolutionists line up the most promising choices to present a gradual progression from monkey to modern man.

They simply fill in the big gaps with make-believe creatures to fit the picture. This procedure can be done with humans only because there are many extinct monkey and ape species. They never do this with giraffes, elephants or the Platypus. The pictures are placed in all of the textbooks that evolutionists use to teach kids this nonsense.

The pictures are simply a grouping of individual species that does not prove evolution. Why do they claim the above discovery is "close to the mission link. Look at the picture. It is a monkey. A monkey species that has become extinct. Lot of species have become extinct. Thousands of species have become extinct. It is obviously not similar to a human. Look at the feet with the big toe spread away from the smaller toes exactly like a modern chimpanzee, not like people.

A newly discovered extinct species does not prove a "missing link" has been found. Don't let them brainwash you with this nonsense. Charles Darwin admitted that fossils of the transitional links between species would have to be found in order to prove his "Theory of Evolution.

We only find individual species. Evolutionists try to form these individual species into a link according to similar major features such as wings or four legs, but this simply proves the Theory of Evolution to be a fraud. Darwin was hopeful that future fossils would prove his theory correct, but instead, the lack of transitional links has proven his theory to be wrong. The presence of individual species actually proves they were not developed by an evolutionary process.

If evolution were true, all plants, animals, and insects would be in a continual state of change. No two creatures would be identical, because they would not be separate species. All life forms would be a continual blend of characteristics without a clear definition among the species.

Everything would be changing, and every animal, insect, and plant would be different. The cheetah above proves evolution does not exist. All species are locked solidly within their DNA code. Evolutionists are going ape over "Ape-Girl.

The fossilized bones of a new animal have been found in Ethiopia near the site where "Lucy" was discovered many years ago. By the way, Lucy was a monkey, not an early humanoid. The number of bones of the Ape-girl skeleton are unique because Lucy had only a few head fragments. This find gives us a lot of information about the animal because major parts of the skeleton were unearthed assuming these are all from the same animal.

It has teeth in the jaw and is said to also have unerupted teeth still within the jaw. The evolutionists call the animal a "human-like" female child about three years of age and an "individual.

It is an "ape-like" fossil because it was an ape. The evolutionists call the animal a "transitional species" and a human ancestor even though it has a head exactly like a modern-day ape. The jaw is thrust forward and the forehead pushed back and slanted. The true appearance is more easily seen from side picture below. Ape-girl also has arms "that dangled down to just above the knees. It also had gorilla-like shoulder blades which suggest it could have been skilled at swinging through trees.

It has a head like an ape. It has arms like an ape. It has shoulder blades like an ape. It is obviously an ape, not a human, pre-human or humanoid. Evolutionists simply will not accept the obvious. This animal is simply a young ape. Its size is as would be expected for a young modern-day ape. Scientists call these ape-like features "evolutionary baggage. The age of this fossilized animal is also very much in doubt.

Scientists many years ago claimed a tooth found was Nebraska Man , a pre-human fossil millions of years old. They determined the age of the tooth. The scientists had sculptured an entire ape-like skeleton from information they found in one tooth. These lies were exposed when real scientists found the tooth to be from a modern-day pig. The find consists of the whole skull, the entire torso, and important parts of the upper and lower limbs.

CT scans reveal unerupted teeth still in the jaw, a detail that makes scientists think the individual may have been about three years old when she died. The hyoid bone reflects how the voice box is built and perhaps what sounds a species can produce.

Judging by how well it was preserved, the skeleton may have come from a body that was quickly buried by sediment in a flood, the researchers said. This puts afarensis in a special position to play a pivotal role in the story of what we are and where we come from. There is considerable argument about whether the Dikika girl could also climb trees like an ape.

This climbing ability would require anatomical equipment like long arms, and the "Lucy" species had arms that dangled down to just above the knees. But the question is whether such features indicate climbing ability or are just "evolutionary baggage". Evolution is in trouble. The growth of biological knowledge is producing scientific facts that contradict the evolutionary theory, not confirm it, a fact that famous Prof.

Steven Jay Gould of Harvard has described as "the trade secret of paleontology. The theory states that infinitesimal changes within each generation evolve into a new species, but the scientific fact remains. Fossils prove the sudden emergence of a new species out of nowhere, complete with characteristics unknown in any other species. The fossil record has no intermediate or transitional forms. This is popularly known as the "missing link" problem, and it exists in all species.

The missing link problem is getting worse, not better, with the discovery of more fossils. The missing links are not being discovered, which proves they never existed. Darwin assumed transitional forms would be discovered in the fossil record over time, but that has not been the case. The fossil record, or lack thereof, is a major embarrassment to evolutionists. The fossil record is a serious rebuke of the Theory of Evolution. New species literally explode onto the scene out of nowhere.

New fossil discoveries continue to prove evolution to be wrong. A Theory in Crisis by Michael Denton. Denton blasts all of the previous arguments made by the pro-evolutionists showing that there is essentially no support of macro-evolution in the fossil record.

He also, clearly demonstrates that there is no support coming from his specialty molecular biology. In the end the only sound explanation he can make is that life is profoundly discontinuous. Harvard Professor Gould claims that evolution occurs in spurts, not gradually.

This theory attempts to explain the lack of continuity in the fossil record. However, this theory is more troublesome than the gradual change theory. Large jumps or spurts in the fossil record don't prove evolution at all. In fact, they disprove evolution. The theory that evolution can occur in spurts, because the fossil record shows it did not occur gradually, is a wild stretch of the imagination.

Species have some characteristics similar to other species, but similarity doesn't prove any evolutionary link whatsoever. There are more than missing links in biology. Many species are dependant upon another species for their coexistence. Hummingbirds and flowers are a good example. The flower would not be pollinated and would become extinct without the bird. They are said to have coevolved together.

That is a stretch of the imagination without any basis in science. There are hundreds of these examples that cannot be explained by evolutionists. Charles Darwin had concern about his theory of natural selection. He knew that a failure to find the missing transitional links would seriously cripple his theory of evolution, but he was hopeful the missing links would be found some day. He died not finding them. Evolutionists have never found the missing links. Each time they announce finding one it is later proven to be false.

The Coelacanth fish was touted to be a transitional form with half-formed legs and primitive lungs, ready to transition onto land. This myth was exploded in December, when a live Coelacanth was caught in a fisherman's net off the eastern coast of South Africa. It is now known that the natives of the Comoro Islands had been catching and eating the fish for years.

It did not have half-formed legs or primitive lungs. It was simply a regular fish that people thought was extinct.

Click the picture to see an enlargement. Evolutionist claimed the million-year-old Coelacanth evolved into animals with legs, feet, and lungs. That was a lie. We now see that the fish recently caught is exactly like the million-year-old fossil. It did not evolve at all. The Coelacanth is a star witness against the false theory of evolution. After million years the fish still doesn't have a leg to stand on. An autopsy and genetic tests are now being carried out to determine more about the specimen.

Coelacanths provide researchers with a window into the past; their fossil record dates back million years. The Archaeopteryx fossil was herald by evolutionists as a significant transitional missing link.

The fossil was discovered in a limestone quarry in southern Germany in and has been debated ever since. The dinosaur creature appears to be a reptile with bird characteristics of wings and feathers. It had the skeleton of a small dinosaur with a tail, fingers with claws on the leading edge of the wing, and teeth in the jaws.

The owners of the property discovered six fossils of which only two had feathers. This inconsistency smells of fraud from the beginning. Upon close examination the feathers appear to be identical to modern chicken feathers.

The Archaeopteryx fossils with feathers have now been declared forgeries by scientists. Bird feathers were then imprinted into the wet cement" according to Dr. Walt Brown's book, In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood , page This is simply another forgery by evolutionists in a desperate attempt to prove Darwin's Theory of Evolution.

Evolutionists can lie and commit fraud without blinking an eye. This example would not have proven evolution even if the feathers had not been forgeries. Finding a few species with characteristics similar to two other species does not prove a link. There should be millions or billions of transitional links if evolution were true, not simply a few. Evolutionists keep getting hit in the face with scientific truth. Therefore, they spend most of their time developing complex lies and molding them into complex theories.

They modify fossil evidence in an attempt to support their false theories. The Platypus Ornithorhynchus anatinus , with its duck bill and webbed feet, is a unique Australian animal. It and the two species of echidna are the only monotremes or egg-laying mammals to be found on earth. The marsupials mammals with pouches, e. The monotremes have lower body temperatures than other mammals and have legs which extend out, then vertically below them.

These features, together with their egg-laying ability, are more like that of a lizard than a mammal. Platypus are readily identified by their streamlined body, webbed feet, broad tail, and characteristic muzzle or bill which is soft and pliable. The Platypus males have spurs on their hind feet that deliver a poisonous venom like a snake. A Platypus sting is powerful enough to make people sick and kill a dog. The Platypus of Australia has characteristics of many species but certainly is not the missing link to all of them.

In fact, it is not a link to any of them. The Platypus has made a joke and a mockery of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution and his unproven theory of natural selection. Scientists fraudulently claim a newly-discovered fish is the second bridge fossil gap between sea and land creatures.

The scientists have apparently forgotten that the first fossil gap, Archaeopteryx, shown above was also a fraud. Tiktaalik therefore becomes fossil gap fraud number 2. Most remarkably, the creature, which was less than 3 feet long, had the body of a fish but the jaws, ribs, and limb-like fins seen in the earliest land mammals. The fish doesn't even have fins as large as expected for its size. The scientists are claiming the fish walked around on the ground out of water and breathed air.

This is pure make-believe speculation. No evidence exists that the fish is anything more than just another species. The excitement about the Tiktaalik fossil is puzzling. Modern-day seals have fins and waddle around on the ground. Modern-day catfish have fins and walk around on the ground. Catfish can live out of water for a long time. Tiktaalik does not provide any support for evolution.

If you believe the nonsense that Tiktaalik is a fossil gap species, you are brainwashed. Evolutionists are now claiming that a dolphin captured with two little extra fins near the tail is proof that dolphins evolved from four-footed animals related to the dog.

Dolphin with four-wheel drive stuns the scientists - November 5, And now the extraordinary discovery of a bottlenosed dolphin with an extra set of flippers has provided living proof of the theory.

At first glance it looks like any other of its kind. But closer inspection reveals a rogue set of rear fins. Each the size of a human hand, the fins are thought to be the remains of a pair of hind legs, adding to evidence that dolphins once walked on all fours. This is nonsense, folks. First, evolutionists tell us that land animals evolved from sea creatures. Now they are trying a new approach, claiming sea creatures evolved from land animals. Dog are still dogs, but they claim that some of the dogs long ago evolved into dolphins.

These "scientists" claim the dolphin evolved from the dog while the rest of the dogs didn't evolved into anything. They simply remained dogs. These "scientists" are not scientists. No scientific evidence exists for these evolutionary theories. This article is an attempt to brainwash the naive. Don't be fooled by these claims. Evolutionists typically use words like "may have evolved" or ""probably evolved" because they lack scientific proof.

The truth is obvious here. God created many species of dolphins. This is simply one species that is very rare. The Fossil Record is Clear Click the image to see full scale. The Theory of Evolution states that minute improvements in an individual within a species increases the likelihood of survival of the offspring. These small steps of improvement continue for countless years until the individuals are changed to such a large extent that a new species has appeared.

This progression is an uninterrupted branch of the "evolutionary tree. They almost look believable, but they are a lie. The siblings of an individual on the uninterrupted branch may fail to develop the minute improvement and may even suffer from an inferior evolutionary change.

Each of these individuals represents a new branch on the tree that is moving away from the uninterrupted branch. Let us say we have , coexisting individuals in a species such as a horse. Only a few of these individuals will begin new branches that will eventually become a new species such as a Zebra. The other 99, individuals may each begin a neutral or inferior branch that may continue for millions of years but will eventually stop, because the last individual on the branch fails to produce an offspring.

The odds that the branch will stop producing offspring is increased when the minute evolutionary changes are inferior. The theory of survival of the fittest or natural selection also works in reverse to produce death to the branch where the changes are inferior. This part of the tree is dead. We see in Scientific Fact No. One superior individual of the , is missing, but now we have an even more serious defect in the theory.

Where are the 99, inferior branches? How could 99, branches go missing? Actually, the fossil record shows that everything is missing. No individuals of the species existed. Most layers of the earth's crust are completely devoid of all life, but then a layer will appear that is teaming with an absolute abundance of separate species, each containing millions of individuals.

This hypothesis of the "missing inferior evolutionary branches" was developed and posted here by the author, Kent R. Rieske, on March 21, Thousands of biology professors at universities around the world, including Darwin, have completely missed this serious deficiency in the fossil record, because they have only been searching for the superior evolutionary branches, not the inferior branches.

Where are the fossils of horses with weak bones that fractured early in life and thereby prevented an offspring from continuing the branch? They don't exist, but they should if the Theory of Evolution were true. In fact, the fossil record should be full of dead branches. The fossil record simply shows individual species that have become extinct. Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water, causing several molecules to combine in a random way, which by chance resulted in a living cell.

The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.

The Theory of Evolution claims that organic life was created from inorganic matter. The top scientists in the world with unlimited laboratory resources cannot change inorganic matter into a single organic living cell. The smallest living cell has the complexity of a Boeing jumbo jet airplane. The components of the smallest living cell have the obvious arrangement showing intelligent design, just as the Boeing did not appear from random parts stacked near each other in a junk yard.

The minimal cell contains more than 60, proteins of different configurations. The smallest single-cell creature has millions of atoms forming millions of molecules that must each be arranged in an exact pattern to provide the required functions. The cell has an energy-producing system, a protective housing, a security system to let molecules into and out of the housing, a reproductive system, and a central control system. This complexity required an intelligent design.

It is much too complex to happen by chance. Guide to designing, conducting, publishing and communicating results of clinical studies involving probiotic applications in human participants".

Probiotics the Scientific Thesis. Retrieved 5 June Research Journal of Biological Sciences. A study of Elie Metchnikoff". Recherchers sur la flora intestinale normale et pathologique du nourisson. Thesis, University of Paris, Paris, France. Feeding Experiments on Man". Lactobacillus acidophilus and its therapeutic application.

Yale University Press, New Haven. Growth-promoting factors produced by microorganisms". Animal Nutrition and Health. Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. Microb Ecol Health Dis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. From Genomics to Probiotics. Journal of Dairy Science. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Archived from the original PDF on May 14, Retrieved May 14, Report of an expert meeting-London, 23 November ".

Celebrating our gut flora". A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews The Journal of Nutrition. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Retrieved 28 October International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. Biomed Res Int Systematic review. Retrieved 1 June Clin Exp Gastroenterol Review. Overall, there is some evidence to suggest that probiotics may be effective in the treatment of RAP, in terms of improving pain in the shorter term.

Clinicians may therefore consider probiotic interventions as part of themanagement strategy for children with RAP Recurrent Abdominal Pain. However, we were unable to recommend the optimum strain and dosage of probiotic based on this review. The evidence for the effectiveness of probiotics was based largely on shorter-term outcomes.

Further trials are required to assess whether improvements in pain are maintained over the longer term; these trials should also consider the importance of using validated and consistent scales to measure pain and other outcomes.

Infection and Inflammation of the Pediatric Genitourinary Tract. Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. Journal of Applied Microbiology. Am J Clin Nutr Review. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. Retrieved 18 June Retrieved 19 May The Microbiology Research Foundation. Retrieved 7 November The case of kefir grains application".

Critical reviews in food science and nutrition. Journal of Medicinal Food. Bridging the gap between consumers, green groups, and industry". Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. Retrieved 12 December Retrieved 13 December SACN members are appointed as independent scientific experts on the basis of their specific skills and knowledge. There are also consumer and lay members. Members are required to conduct themselves in accordance with the Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory Committees.

This information is updated as and when declarations are made. View the SACN main meeting minutes and papers. View the SMCN minutes and papers. Meetings are held in closed session. View the Saturated Fats Working Group minutes and papers. View the Vitamin D Working Group minutes and papers from until the completion of its work.

References